You randomly start throwing out dates about when the new trial boards were created and stuff, but the important boards get no mention.
4chan used to be before GoDaddy locked and suspended the domain. I think this is too important to the foundation of 4chan to ignore. The articles mentions "anime fans", but no mention of ADTRW. So much so that in the beginning moot had to address them about their "elitest attitude" towards new members. As such, the primary userbase was largely ADTRW users. 4chan was first advertised to the ADTRW subforum in the SomethingAwful forums.
There is a LOT missing from this article. I was just going to start editing away but I figured I would take it up with you lot first. Transfinite ( Talk / Contribs) 17:53, 30 March 2007 (UTC) Yeah, leave the ads, their not hurting anyone.that I know of. Wo o ty Woot? contribs 18:46, 9 March 2007 (UTC) Invasions, what invasions? Pacific Coast Highway 17:33, 30 March 2007 (UTC) Wait, what? Moot changed the ad provider in early January, but 4chan has had banner ads long before that. If we can't, I'd keep it where it is - it doesn't really deserve its own section, being so short. I sort of agree, but if we want to have an invasion s section, we need to have more sources of the other invasions like old Greeny and Girl talk and co. I'd edit the page now but it seems to be locked.
Perhaps an ivasions section is in order? I don't mean to glorify these, but if we're interested in tracking such things this would be the better way to do it. Tom Green) and (b) these events don t really fit the definition of "controversy". I don't believe the Hal Turner ivasion merits its own section in the controversy section, because (a) 4chan and 7chan have both done quite a few invasions, some of which were more widespread than this (i.e.
0 kommentar(er)
